Are we now blaming the shareholders that could not

Are we now blaming the shareholders that could not quit their jobs to go to Texas and help? Maybe the ones that did not have 25K to spend on moving out there. Are we blaming the shareholders that invested on promises and are frustrated because of lack of delivery? Are you implying that some of us shareholders should have borrowed money on our assets/homes and spent more on TECO to help get this thing going and since we didn't we have no room to be upset and voice our concerns? I would hope not.