and one that went *poof* this afternoon fascinati
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 12/07/2013 5:57:08 PM
and one that went *poof* this afternoon >> fascinating to observe/document the total *inCONsistency*
=====
and good morning to you (or in my case afternoon)
taking them (points) in reverse
[b]i too am not expecting anything out of the AGM [/b]
when i asked IR about the AGM (when PR'd) indication
and my interpretation of IR's comments were *mere formality*
[b]re: bombardment >> it's a tried and true tactic re: agendas[/b]
i've found it helpful to lay out time lines and note specifics
not limited to but including (trade dox/sec input and when revealed/hit pieces/known info via contacts @ various locales)
[b]re: first authored hit piece in July 2010 [/b]
info exists via this very venue (ihub's search is worth paying for)
what to me was most *notable* was the timing of >> in conjunction
with other *FACTS* >> not the least of which was CSTI's utilization
as the SECONDARY MM to NITE's PRIMARY MM re: JBII
oh yeah .. WSB's redo of 2009 was filed then too
[b]
Why the A company et al are were touted consistently [/b]
darn i do miss those touts
that said as i've frequently noted >> it's all about the cycle of $$$$$ in play
i missed a major clue re: the A co (ie ceo installation)
but again i've posted about it via this very venue after *catching* it
DD done on the A co.s *ceo* will reveal another *layer/level* of the cycle of $$$$$
successful early adopter in this emerging tech *wins*
[b]Is this an emerging tech?[/b]
each is responsible for their DD
i'm comfortable with mine >> as always those who require more clarity
should wait for it >> for some that will come at uplisting
for others >> most likely an audit publicly released on 3's ops
or for others the sale of a proc to X co. @ Y price tag
[b]has JBi ever failed to access capital? [/b]
to my knowledge financing has never been an issue
one could argue that mgmt takes the least amount possible
as i posted previously in RH's seat (altho' not being an insider
and having no knowledge of what is en route) i'd double the expected
amount *anticipated* >> since aspects always take longer than most expect
here's to what mgmt articulates on Tuesday
===
4kids
all jmo
=====
and good morning to you (or in my case afternoon)
taking them (points) in reverse
[b]i too am not expecting anything out of the AGM [/b]
when i asked IR about the AGM (when PR'd) indication
and my interpretation of IR's comments were *mere formality*
[b]re: bombardment >> it's a tried and true tactic re: agendas[/b]
i've found it helpful to lay out time lines and note specifics
not limited to but including (trade dox/sec input and when revealed/hit pieces/known info via contacts @ various locales)
[b]re: first authored hit piece in July 2010 [/b]
info exists via this very venue (ihub's search is worth paying for)
what to me was most *notable* was the timing of >> in conjunction
with other *FACTS* >> not the least of which was CSTI's utilization
as the SECONDARY MM to NITE's PRIMARY MM re: JBII
oh yeah .. WSB's redo of 2009 was filed then too
[b]
Why the A company et al are were touted consistently [/b]
darn i do miss those touts
that said as i've frequently noted >> it's all about the cycle of $$$$$ in play
i missed a major clue re: the A co (ie ceo installation)
but again i've posted about it via this very venue after *catching* it
DD done on the A co.s *ceo* will reveal another *layer/level* of the cycle of $$$$$
successful early adopter in this emerging tech *wins*
[b]Is this an emerging tech?[/b]
each is responsible for their DD
i'm comfortable with mine >> as always those who require more clarity
should wait for it >> for some that will come at uplisting
for others >> most likely an audit publicly released on 3's ops
or for others the sale of a proc to X co. @ Y price tag
[b]has JBi ever failed to access capital? [/b]
to my knowledge financing has never been an issue
one could argue that mgmt takes the least amount possible
as i posted previously in RH's seat (altho' not being an insider
and having no knowledge of what is en route) i'd double the expected
amount *anticipated* >> since aspects always take longer than most expect
here's to what mgmt articulates on Tuesday
===
4kids
all jmo
(0)
(0)