Regarding your statement: "and those here who appe
Post# of 41414
Posted On: 11/25/2013 10:58:04 AM
Regarding your statement: "and those here who appear to have inside knowledge are hinting 4- 5 months more one even mentioned August 2014 in passing recently."
This is completely false. I can guarantee you no real insider thinks 4-5 months is a remotely realistic timeline for something that should be done by February. No one with real inside knowledge or even PUBLIC knowledge would suggest such an absurd length of time, considering training is 25% completed....so these people must either be suggesting a huge delay or setback (which is just a guess and nothing more), or they think the timeline of training is genuinely 4-5 months longer than originally thought (which has zero factual evidence to support it).
I can understand preparing oneself for the worst case scenario. But unless these "insiders" you claim to know of can produce even half-intelligent reasons for why Baltia might get delayed for training that has already begun, their statements are nothing more than 100% speculation.
"After all these years and especially the past few years, they should have been airboure months ago if things are as good as they say they are with the FAA. "
When has Baltia come out and said their repertoire is great with the FAA? My point is, even if this is true, unless they've said it in some way (which they have not), I wouldn't be so quick to jump on their backs and say "well they keep saying we're best pals with the FAA so why is this $hit taking so long?"....in a way, you have a very good question, which you should bring to the shareholders meeting.
This is completely false. I can guarantee you no real insider thinks 4-5 months is a remotely realistic timeline for something that should be done by February. No one with real inside knowledge or even PUBLIC knowledge would suggest such an absurd length of time, considering training is 25% completed....so these people must either be suggesting a huge delay or setback (which is just a guess and nothing more), or they think the timeline of training is genuinely 4-5 months longer than originally thought (which has zero factual evidence to support it).
I can understand preparing oneself for the worst case scenario. But unless these "insiders" you claim to know of can produce even half-intelligent reasons for why Baltia might get delayed for training that has already begun, their statements are nothing more than 100% speculation.
"After all these years and especially the past few years, they should have been airboure months ago if things are as good as they say they are with the FAA. "
When has Baltia come out and said their repertoire is great with the FAA? My point is, even if this is true, unless they've said it in some way (which they have not), I wouldn't be so quick to jump on their backs and say "well they keep saying we're best pals with the FAA so why is this $hit taking so long?"....in a way, you have a very good question, which you should bring to the shareholders meeting.
(0)
(0)