slightly different name -otcmarkets shows Casino A
Post# of 8059
Posted On: 11/24/2013 2:38:13 AM
Re: mediscience #5574
slightly different name -otcmarkets shows Casino Airlinks Inc as the co that preceded CWRN-specialized national Jurisdiction court -so cant tell that by that
Since Casino Airlinks Inc was based in Boca Raton Florida,what are the odds that Oppenheimer opened a corporate account for Customer KI in its Boca Raton office on approximately March 17, 2009-such stock sold by June 2009.
if my broker had an office in my city I would use that local office -so a principal in Casino Airlinks- located in Boca Raton -
could have presented his Casino stock cert to the transfer agent,and had it reissued as a CWRN stock cert,w maybe the agent missing a r/s,and then used the local Oppenheimer office-1 of 8 Oppenheimer offices in Florida,to deposit his certificate
what are the odds of using the Boca Raton office out of ca 100 Oppenheimer offices -when Casino Airlinks was based in Boca Raton ,unless there was a connection
this came up because there is no proof anywhere that CWRN ever issued restricted stock except to family-
the 12-28-08 offering -of which only $30000 of stock was shown as sold via the filing -issued by Jan 21,2009 according to the filing- is the only possible candidate- and just because an issue is exempted does not mean its restricted, as I posted from rule 504-nothing on the many page form indicates it was restricted -and the math doesnt work for 2.1 million shares there either
stockpromoters.com doesnt show any restricted stock in connection w any promo -paid promos either were cash or free trading stock
the 2-18-10 convertible offering-of which only 50000 shares or $50000 -cant remember which just now-was after the Oppenheimer games-and nothing on the form indicates it was restricted =-if it was u would think the form would say so
the only restricted we know about issued by CWRN was to family members -closely held in certificate form only as control shares -see Nov 2010 PR's etc- and not deposited anywhere -so could NOT be traded-
exhibit in CWRN complaint against GEO shows such a cert transferred to Geo as part payment for funds provided by Geo (again well after the Oppenheimer games-and dont think any Geo held stock was restricted by sec,only by agreement w CWRN as to timing of selling such funds-see CWRN complaint) plus those expended by Bob- last filing showed Bob having expended 1.6 mill of his own money (2 million w interest) -were the means of payment for the startup -not restricted stock etc
the importance is that if CWRN can show the stock deposited into Oppenheimer wast even issued by CWRN, CWRN should be off the hook even w an agency that is famous for not believing in due process or the constitution
at any rate, there's no rational reason to freeze all CWRN stock of innocent 3rd party purchasers when the supposed illegal stock was already placed in the market by June 2009 -its already out there --
and such a tiny amount out of the pool of O/S its ridiculous, as is stock illegally "issued" as nss by brokers and mm's in thousands of companies-and such illegally issued broker/mm stock could easily exceed a paltry 2.1 million worth $8400 when sold by Oppenheimer
Since Casino Airlinks Inc was based in Boca Raton Florida,what are the odds that Oppenheimer opened a corporate account for Customer KI in its Boca Raton office on approximately March 17, 2009-such stock sold by June 2009.
if my broker had an office in my city I would use that local office -so a principal in Casino Airlinks- located in Boca Raton -
could have presented his Casino stock cert to the transfer agent,and had it reissued as a CWRN stock cert,w maybe the agent missing a r/s,and then used the local Oppenheimer office-1 of 8 Oppenheimer offices in Florida,to deposit his certificate
what are the odds of using the Boca Raton office out of ca 100 Oppenheimer offices -when Casino Airlinks was based in Boca Raton ,unless there was a connection
this came up because there is no proof anywhere that CWRN ever issued restricted stock except to family-
the 12-28-08 offering -of which only $30000 of stock was shown as sold via the filing -issued by Jan 21,2009 according to the filing- is the only possible candidate- and just because an issue is exempted does not mean its restricted, as I posted from rule 504-nothing on the many page form indicates it was restricted -and the math doesnt work for 2.1 million shares there either
stockpromoters.com doesnt show any restricted stock in connection w any promo -paid promos either were cash or free trading stock
the 2-18-10 convertible offering-of which only 50000 shares or $50000 -cant remember which just now-was after the Oppenheimer games-and nothing on the form indicates it was restricted =-if it was u would think the form would say so
the only restricted we know about issued by CWRN was to family members -closely held in certificate form only as control shares -see Nov 2010 PR's etc- and not deposited anywhere -so could NOT be traded-
exhibit in CWRN complaint against GEO shows such a cert transferred to Geo as part payment for funds provided by Geo (again well after the Oppenheimer games-and dont think any Geo held stock was restricted by sec,only by agreement w CWRN as to timing of selling such funds-see CWRN complaint) plus those expended by Bob- last filing showed Bob having expended 1.6 mill of his own money (2 million w interest) -were the means of payment for the startup -not restricted stock etc
the importance is that if CWRN can show the stock deposited into Oppenheimer wast even issued by CWRN, CWRN should be off the hook even w an agency that is famous for not believing in due process or the constitution
at any rate, there's no rational reason to freeze all CWRN stock of innocent 3rd party purchasers when the supposed illegal stock was already placed in the market by June 2009 -its already out there --
and such a tiny amount out of the pool of O/S its ridiculous, as is stock illegally "issued" as nss by brokers and mm's in thousands of companies-and such illegally issued broker/mm stock could easily exceed a paltry 2.1 million worth $8400 when sold by Oppenheimer
(0)
(0)