As mentioned before, CWRN did not issue ANY restri
Post# of 8059
Posted On: 11/21/2013 9:09:46 PM
As mentioned before, CWRN did not issue ANY restricted shares except to family members as control shares- see Nov 2010(not 2011 as I've been saying-how time flies when u are having fun while politically targeted cwrn/low pennies politically motivated entities instructed to go after small business since the high level politician was frustrated he couldnt do anything about big business( tv doc and Charlie Rose program etc) and shorters defraud longs, reducing pps from over 3c to .0003) PR's etc -
and those were held by the family members in certificate form only - not even deposited w dtc etc, so could NOT be traded
I was wondering why dtc would even come after CWRN if the restricted shares were issued by Casino Airlinks ,but this might explain it:
If the actual cert said CWRN, the holder had at some point after 2006, sent them to the Transfer agent to reissue after a split, at that point they would have been printed on CWRN certs..
DTC philosophy, as indicated by posted articles,like many prosecutors, is that everybody is guilty- guilty until proven innocent-and until now they havent even allowed due process to contest these things- as many companies PR's say dtc wont even tell company lawyers whats going on -why dtc restricted or global locked them
so dtc,like otc does with falsely imputed ce's without doing any investigation other than looking at charts,as they told me re CWRN's ce when shorters fraudulently shouted to otc that CWRN had a massive newsletter promo -when there was no promo- all non regulatory for profit otc had to do was look at promoters.com etc and ask CWRN etc-, apparently does not feel the need to investigate to see where the shares actually ORIGINATED from- apparently Casino Airlinks -not CWRN!!!
so dtc automatically locks the over 1 dozen companies in the Oppenheimer situation down with no due process and without even notification of some.
Brad was not notified by the dtc- he learned about it from another of the many companies in the Oppenheimer sweep-and no, DTC did not notify Bob either, as a vendetta basher suggested on another board.
Re the dividend in 6-2006 that I quoted from otcmarkets.com,
If those were shares paid as a Dividend, they would have automatically been free, like all the other shares that were given out by CWRN...CWRN did not issue any restricted shares since CWRN took it over in 2006, other than control shares that were held in Certificate form and not deposited anywhere.
and those were held by the family members in certificate form only - not even deposited w dtc etc, so could NOT be traded
I was wondering why dtc would even come after CWRN if the restricted shares were issued by Casino Airlinks ,but this might explain it:
If the actual cert said CWRN, the holder had at some point after 2006, sent them to the Transfer agent to reissue after a split, at that point they would have been printed on CWRN certs..
DTC philosophy, as indicated by posted articles,like many prosecutors, is that everybody is guilty- guilty until proven innocent-and until now they havent even allowed due process to contest these things- as many companies PR's say dtc wont even tell company lawyers whats going on -why dtc restricted or global locked them
so dtc,like otc does with falsely imputed ce's without doing any investigation other than looking at charts,as they told me re CWRN's ce when shorters fraudulently shouted to otc that CWRN had a massive newsletter promo -when there was no promo- all non regulatory for profit otc had to do was look at promoters.com etc and ask CWRN etc-, apparently does not feel the need to investigate to see where the shares actually ORIGINATED from- apparently Casino Airlinks -not CWRN!!!
so dtc automatically locks the over 1 dozen companies in the Oppenheimer situation down with no due process and without even notification of some.
Brad was not notified by the dtc- he learned about it from another of the many companies in the Oppenheimer sweep-and no, DTC did not notify Bob either, as a vendetta basher suggested on another board.
Re the dividend in 6-2006 that I quoted from otcmarkets.com,
If those were shares paid as a Dividend, they would have automatically been free, like all the other shares that were given out by CWRN...CWRN did not issue any restricted shares since CWRN took it over in 2006, other than control shares that were held in Certificate form and not deposited anywhere.
(0)
(0)