Hi, Kgem. You seem to have radically misread my po

Hi, Kgem. You seem to have radically misread my post. The last thing anyone should want here is lawsuits, and I see no reason why a definitive agreement shouldn't be worked out that reconciles the interests of all parties, Lonnie Hayward included. I was simply pointing out that, if Lonnie has given his word that the Class C preferred shares in his possession will be retired, as we have been led to believe, that commit,ment should be respected. Over the past few days a huge number of shares have been traded, and a sizable proportion of those shares has been traded at below .0001, as shown by the prices the prices in the Time&Sales list. A lot of shareholders I talk to every day over the phone find that unnerving and deeply disquieting. Why has there been no bid/ask spread? In other words, I am saying and have always said that there is plenty of room to find a solution that will be everyone's long-term interests, but not detrimental to long-suffering shareholders or to HIMR itself.

I find myself in full agreement with Intergracer's remark in his latest post:

"Ty for the info sky. If himr can get some trees out of the water and work out an agreement with the c class shares, as long as there isn't any r/s, we should be alright long term with himr."

That is not an extremist position. I just don't see why shareholders should acquiesce in being led down the garden path or marched to the woodshed. Ideally we should try to work proactively with all the interested parties, and I have praised the initiatives taken in that direction. If that is not clear enough, please send me a PM.