they also need an english translator to make it mo
Post# of 8054
and yes, if I were them I would be careful about claiming equipment which is in fact presently in CWRN's ownership-
and if Geo wishes to change that they have the burden of proof-which they keep delaying w imo non-stop games
-and when they are no longer asking for the 3 small used ex's and payloader, and only asking compensation for 2 other items- so why do they list the equipment at all in such a case? confusing at best to investors and misleading or worse at the worst
wonder why they havent been asking for the 4 pieces in their original claim- did CWRN give them those pieces-CWRN no longer needs those pieces