I'm surprised no one is talking about the 140 shar

I'm surprised no one is talking about the 140 shareholders.  Doesn't that seem strange.  140 shareholders for 2.1 billion shares.  Does that mean there was no dilution?  I mean we know we went from 500 M shares to 2.1 billion shares, but just 140 shareholders?  Plus they paid off $7 M in debt during the so called dilution phase?  Question is do you think it was all in-house like iEquity or that Canadian billionaire or someone related like that?  If so, wouldn't that mean that they will be holding for control?