It is not a matter of trust. That plays no basis i

It is not a matter of trust. That plays no basis in this.  Trust is an emotion.  Business is emotionless.  What matters is what that share represents and the value of the assets behind that share.  Are they undervalued, overvalued?  What is the direction of those assets?  Are they stagnate, or growing or dissolving?   The clues are in the pieces, and the pieces make the puzzle.

If what ever the new corp is or portends to be contains the more pieces to the puzzle than currently exists?  What matter does the form take? the value is still the same.  If you are asking me if I think it is a good idea to pay say 20K for 1/400th of a company with a product I like, My Family likes, and my friends like?  A company that has the potential to be an absolute blockbuster? A company with which the proceeds I am using from another profitable transaction to make this one?  well my answer is YES.

You can check my history - I have followed this company since pre reverse split.  I have corresponded directly with Brian- albeit one year ago.  For some reason I keep coming back here.   Why?  I wish I could explain it, as I wish I could explain Trust in business.  But when you pull yourself away for a little while.  Lay out all the pieces of that puzzle, the picture becomes clearer.  Too many posters are caught in the minutiae of the grind for this company to grow.  You may not see it, but it is growing.  Like a tree, you cannot see the rings from the outside, but every year a new one is added?  Can you explain that?   Nope.  I can't either.

At the end of the day.  I believe the value of what I put into the company is what I expect to be and better, I do not get hung up on the difference of 1 or 1.5 when the value is the same.  He needs to meet the requirements I do not care how, just that he does.