per the usual bogus bs of that vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation ..
these last 2 posts have been removed as OT .. yep i can see why London (and Knight) would have a problem . .
regardless here are the last round of ?s i had posted this morning .. (deleted by minions)
feel free to copy and paste in any additional ?s or send them directly to IR
these last 2 posts have been removed as OT .. yep i can see why London (and Knight) would have a problem . .
regardless here are the last round of ?s i had posted this morning .. (deleted by minions)
feel free to copy and paste in any additional ?s or send them directly to IR
| [b][i]Questions for the upcoming JBI CC[/i] .. i spoke briefly with IR re: [color=blue]11.12.13[/color] CC [/b] to quote Chris .. this will be a *comprehensive* CC (update) across all levels .. (i took that as a comparison to the rather brief CC held by new mgmt back in mid August) anyone interested in having their ?s sent onto IR .. i'm compiling and will forward onto IR over the coming days .. 1) an update on 3 and where it stands in the month+ ending since 3rd Q (9.30.13) 2) RH's comments about sale of prox (8.15.13) and where that stands (initial contacts/how many/status of/time lines) and how mgmt sees that in relation to co.s existing business model .. 3) where do additional candidates for the BoD stand (time line) 4) RKT. Jacksonville? Which machines when? Status of site, building, etc. Status "partnership' agreement - is it history? Intentions of partners if any? 5) Supply agreements? Crayola cannot supply p3 at full capacity, let alone a m/c group. Above all seek regular, clear, production figures including costs. All supporters want facts, good or bad .. 6) side letter <status of> 7) I'm sure CC time will only permit questions of material importance so this will not qualify for your list; but I would like to know whether management intends to defend its staff with legal response to actionable libel? I am sickened by recent excesses. ex 8) The latest permit modification has been interpreted by some to mean that the new limitation on input materials is 4,000lbs. of plastic plus 3,000+lbs of heat transfer fluid per hour per processor. Is that correct? 9) It appears that the upcoming election of directors will not include any "Qualified Independent Directors" as defined by the letter agreement between the Investors Group and John Bordynuik. Has the Group communicated their intentions to you vis-a-vis the requirement that Bordynuik offer to sell them his preferred A shares? Do they intend to buy the Preferred A shares? If so, would that not put them in a position as holders of greater than 50% of the shares, in accordance with the by-laws, to call a special meeting to elect directors of their choosing? 10.1) What additional testing is needed to prove #3’s capabilities and how long will that likely take? 10.2) Is #1 being used to preheat plastic for #2 and #3 and if so, does that mean future processors/clusters will require an additional kiln for this purpose? 10.3) Is the use of HTF a production necessity and thus sourcing of it a part of all future production facility operational plans? 11.1) Will fabrication of future processors continue to be out sourced and if so, will Heddle Marine play any role in those fab/assembly activities? 11.2) If processors are sold will there be operation, maintenance or profit sharing agreements as part of those contracts? 11.3) What is JBII’s current business model? What entities are expressing the most interest in P2O and how does their interest manifest in or shape the business model? 12.1) If I was interested in purchasing a processor, what type of plastic is required and how much HTF would I need to source? 12.2) What is timeline for receiving one? 12.3) What would I be required to supply for square footage, power, load/unload equipment, manpower, etc. 13) Guidance for Q4 and how many chemists are on staff. 14) What were your reasons for withdrawing from the Investor Group? 15.1) What are your targeted throughput rates to be considered production ready? l5.2) Are you identifying different throughput rates for different feedstocks? 15.3) When do you expect to resolve any remaining issues that are preventing reliable up times at desired throughput rates? 15.4) If throughput is reported as generating X barrels of fuel per hour, what is the ratio of HTF to plastic that was used to report X? 15.5) What points of failure for P3 were identified as the throughput testing was ramped up? 15.6) Were any points of failure identified below desired throughput rates and, if so, can the causes of those points of failure be remedied? ==== just copy and paste ?s or post them to me .. and i'll update at least 1x per day .. === 4kids all jmo |
