Ok... if I understand you correctly, your saying i

Ok... if I understand you correctly, your saying in essence, talk is cheap, and its the exaggerated claims (both in support of, and against) that are keeping the PPS low.  You appear to be also saying that the ONLY thing that will improve the PPS... is documented profits.   If that is correct, I still disagree.

What improves the PPS is investors willing to pay more and more to own a piece of the company.  Period.  What causes investors to be willing to pay more and more for a stock is their own DD.  Once they do some DD, they decide to invest or not.

Can exaggerated talk on a message board influence an investor's decision... perhaps.  But I personally think such talk only influences a novice investor.  Prudent investors can and do base their buying decisions on true and documented information - weighted against risk/reward, not Rich types posting unsupported claims on a message board.

Regarding Steve's comments and thoughts... its my opinion that if anyone is against the company, they will interpret his comments negatively, while those who believe in the company will interpret his comments positively.  In my opinion, Steve being the CEO of the company, he has unique responsibilities and liabilities, and as such he can be held accountable for his public comments, unlike the Rich types, or those that would make exaggerated claims in support of the company.  Steve walks a fine line posting here, and I for one give him great credit for doing such, as he has a lot more at stake than many of us... but as I said, I may interpret his comments differently than those without belief.

Steve... if you read this... keep up the good work !