The assumptions contained in your questions are fa
Post# of 11899
Posted On: 10/25/2013 7:21:47 PM
Re: Dreamaker56 #11569
The assumptions contained in your questions are faulty. I have never deleted or given the so-called "wrath" against any post or poster of whom merely outlined the level of dilution or complained about the dilution. I think it is rather obvious that we all know by now that management has diluted to a large degree in the past and they continue to dilute the O/S. That is not in question. I myself have posted the O/S figures before and I was the one who updated the iBox with the updated O/S figures showing over 2B shares in the O/S, though it looks like I will again need to update it to include the newest updated numbers. Your personal attacks against me are unwarranted. This is an opinion board, feel free to share your opinions. HOWEVER, what may begin to get deleted, are posts which are constant and consist of direct declarative statements that this company and/or management is merely a scam. As I explained in many posts in the past, any post which insinuates or claims that the company/stock is a scam will likely get deleted. I have so far (after years) been provided with ZERO evidence that this company is nothing more than a fraud/scam. They have indeed diluted, I myself have complained about it and so have others, but just read the board, their posts have not been deleted. The posts which have been deleted contained personal attacks against Cheryl Shuman, the CEO and/or insisting that the company is only a scam. This is not rocket science, it's pretty basic, bud, scream about the level of rampant dilution all you want, but I refuse to allow this board deteriorate into a cesspool of "bashers" of whom have one agenda and that is to convince everyone that this company is just another stinky pink scam.
Instead of attacking others and their opinions, regardless of how often they post, how about providing your own factual opinions of the company, the stock and management? Share with us some DD, if it's not too difficult for your brain to perform. I'm sure we would all appreciate another perspective and/or new DD about RFMK. But I imagine no one here cares about you popping in every other month with a few of your own personal attacks and rants about other posters and nothing else. It's weak, it's for the weak minded. It's easy to sit behind your keyboard at home and bash other posters, but it is more worthwhile expressing in detail your own opinions on the matter of RFMK and if you only wish to focus on the negativity of dilution then so be it, but others see a vastly greater perspective and are not afraid to share it with others. My point is, make your points about RFMK, but do not make your point to be a point about other posters, or suggesting or declaring that RFMK is a scam, such posts may begin to get deleted if they persist. Simple. Learn. Share. Prosper.
Do or do not, there is no try.
GLTY
Instead of attacking others and their opinions, regardless of how often they post, how about providing your own factual opinions of the company, the stock and management? Share with us some DD, if it's not too difficult for your brain to perform. I'm sure we would all appreciate another perspective and/or new DD about RFMK. But I imagine no one here cares about you popping in every other month with a few of your own personal attacks and rants about other posters and nothing else. It's weak, it's for the weak minded. It's easy to sit behind your keyboard at home and bash other posters, but it is more worthwhile expressing in detail your own opinions on the matter of RFMK and if you only wish to focus on the negativity of dilution then so be it, but others see a vastly greater perspective and are not afraid to share it with others. My point is, make your points about RFMK, but do not make your point to be a point about other posters, or suggesting or declaring that RFMK is a scam, such posts may begin to get deleted if they persist. Simple. Learn. Share. Prosper.
Do or do not, there is no try.
GLTY
(0)
(0)