Bashers or not HIMR has earned the negative positi
Post# of 17862
Posted On: 10/23/2013 10:21:27 AM
Bashers or not HIMR has earned the negative position they find themselves in. JB is right, there has been no news with meat on the bone. When we have gotten info, it only hints at something more positive to come. Until they come through with something genuine and real, we are all lying to ourselves in HOPES of there being something. Let's be honest with ourselves and HIMR and let's see them become honest with us, because the truth is, they have not provided any truth or facts to support a thing.
Now, we are distracted by playing facebook games with bashers, (paid or not, who gives a rats behind!) and having some egos stroked because HIMR mentioned us in a post. "Likes" do not drive share prices! Come on, are we 10 years old? Someone "bashing" has just as much effect on getting them to respond as us calling and pestering. Again, HIMR has earned their reputation and if they want it changed, it's up to them to respond to the negativity they have given birth to. Let them be bashed, unless they can bring their continual promises to fruition, they deserve to be bashed for not doing so and only providing lip service.
You can't polish a turd and if they can't provide something honest and real in the way of simple factual news on progress or what are the actual "pitfalls" (without hinting at it), then we flush them. Leave them to their own devices. We look silly here. We defend defend nothing more than a concept. Yes, it is a good concept, but it's not rocket science and any one of us could sell the same claims. Yes there is money to had in underwater forestry and it's been around longer than most investors may realize and the idea of a technology that can harvest and bring these money logs in safer and quicker certainly will speed up profits and give someone the competitive, upper-hand edge, but HIMR is not yet demonstrating they are capable of such a task or truly in the ring to compete. You think their quietness is really keeping secrets? We chatter all over the place about it, so there is nothing we are keeping secretive from competitors, and remember these are competitors that are actually logging on the waters, turning a profit and running established companies. They are not stupid. They know what is really happening in underwater forestry, they are there on the lakes everyday, doing the work, learning what does and doesn't work. You honestly think they are sitting back and and saying that 1 or 2 logs a day is good enough? Fact is HIMR is only a concept to invest in and has done a poor job of trying to sell the concept with nothing real to back it up. That is why there is a no bid, not because of some kids playing games on facebook, not because some idiot on another forum or this one says something bad about them. Results drive share prices and that is the bottom-line!
To HIMR, you need to show your progress or lack of progress in honest open statements with real examples. Do this on your website blog or through real business channels or you are doomed to stay where you are and take all of us down with you. Do your homework, run your business or get out of the ring.
It would be nice to be proven wrong of course, as we all want to see a nice return on our investment(s), but we can't drive this bus for them, nor we should do so any longer.
Now, we are distracted by playing facebook games with bashers, (paid or not, who gives a rats behind!) and having some egos stroked because HIMR mentioned us in a post. "Likes" do not drive share prices! Come on, are we 10 years old? Someone "bashing" has just as much effect on getting them to respond as us calling and pestering. Again, HIMR has earned their reputation and if they want it changed, it's up to them to respond to the negativity they have given birth to. Let them be bashed, unless they can bring their continual promises to fruition, they deserve to be bashed for not doing so and only providing lip service.
You can't polish a turd and if they can't provide something honest and real in the way of simple factual news on progress or what are the actual "pitfalls" (without hinting at it), then we flush them. Leave them to their own devices. We look silly here. We defend defend nothing more than a concept. Yes, it is a good concept, but it's not rocket science and any one of us could sell the same claims. Yes there is money to had in underwater forestry and it's been around longer than most investors may realize and the idea of a technology that can harvest and bring these money logs in safer and quicker certainly will speed up profits and give someone the competitive, upper-hand edge, but HIMR is not yet demonstrating they are capable of such a task or truly in the ring to compete. You think their quietness is really keeping secrets? We chatter all over the place about it, so there is nothing we are keeping secretive from competitors, and remember these are competitors that are actually logging on the waters, turning a profit and running established companies. They are not stupid. They know what is really happening in underwater forestry, they are there on the lakes everyday, doing the work, learning what does and doesn't work. You honestly think they are sitting back and and saying that 1 or 2 logs a day is good enough? Fact is HIMR is only a concept to invest in and has done a poor job of trying to sell the concept with nothing real to back it up. That is why there is a no bid, not because of some kids playing games on facebook, not because some idiot on another forum or this one says something bad about them. Results drive share prices and that is the bottom-line!
To HIMR, you need to show your progress or lack of progress in honest open statements with real examples. Do this on your website blog or through real business channels or you are doomed to stay where you are and take all of us down with you. Do your homework, run your business or get out of the ring.
It would be nice to be proven wrong of course, as we all want to see a nice return on our investment(s), but we can't drive this bus for them, nor we should do so any longer.
(0)
(0)