Hi PP. Glad you have been able to recuperate some
Post# of 5066
Posted On: 10/23/2013 7:27:38 AM
Hi PP. Glad you have been able to recuperate some of your losses! 
I have not been able to use this site for a couple of days--don't know what the problem has been but I just kept getting error messages each time I logged in or refreshed from an old page.
I have looked through every attachment for the S1 filing and have compared them with prior filings & subsequent queries by the SEC relating to past Koos deals. I'll admit, he has changed his approach and can back his claims by way of the doctors he has under contract. But, if the investor with close family ties with an SEC lawyer did in fact submit the complaint to the SEC with all of the information he had in hand about Koos's past dealings, I, for the life of me, cannot see the SEC not delaying this S1 or worse. Between his past deals and them mirroring what has gone on with BMSN & ENTB and Hicks being involved, there are a lot of issues that point to direct intervention being needed in order to further protect investors from more financial destruction.
I still do not for one minute believe there is anything credible about the 100K for 100K deal between Koos & Hicks and that it should be considered a legitimate valuation for Regen. That is my opinion and it is based on a number of factors and not just the obvious (Hicks being a notorious crook). Again, that is my opinion.
I have not been able to use this site for a couple of days--don't know what the problem has been but I just kept getting error messages each time I logged in or refreshed from an old page.
I have looked through every attachment for the S1 filing and have compared them with prior filings & subsequent queries by the SEC relating to past Koos deals. I'll admit, he has changed his approach and can back his claims by way of the doctors he has under contract. But, if the investor with close family ties with an SEC lawyer did in fact submit the complaint to the SEC with all of the information he had in hand about Koos's past dealings, I, for the life of me, cannot see the SEC not delaying this S1 or worse. Between his past deals and them mirroring what has gone on with BMSN & ENTB and Hicks being involved, there are a lot of issues that point to direct intervention being needed in order to further protect investors from more financial destruction.
I still do not for one minute believe there is anything credible about the 100K for 100K deal between Koos & Hicks and that it should be considered a legitimate valuation for Regen. That is my opinion and it is based on a number of factors and not just the obvious (Hicks being a notorious crook). Again, that is my opinion.
(0)
(0)