If I invested 20 bucks or 20,000 bucks - why shoul
Post# of 5066
Posted On: 10/08/2013 11:24:07 AM
.jpg)
Re: patientgal #3744
If I invested 20 bucks or 20,000 bucks - why should you care? I see people post they have 3 million shares, 20 million shares, etc... Why is that important to me? I get the whole thing of people selling a massive amount of shares can affect the PPS. But, I can do nothing about what someone does with what they own.
My entire post was about the people who are losing money right now and publicly bashing the CEO. To me, it makes no sense. It only serves to make the return on your investment less.
PG, you've said Koos reads this board. How would you feel if your name is being dragged through the dirt by people who are threatening legal action? You tend to start not caring about your investors and do whats in your best interest. If he covers himself legally, the investor has no recourse except spending more money in legal fees to get a small percentage of their money back. You are on the short end either way you go.
I'm not taking up for Koos, I don't even know the guy or want to know him. I want the science to come out to help people in need. If I can make a profit off of this, that would be even better. I can't make a profit if the people in charge of the company are feeling threatened. It will prolong the science making it out to help people if the company doesn't have the value it needs to proceed. At present, even if we get FDA approval, the PPS will not bounce as high as it could because of the skepticism about the management of the company. The skepticism is on display here and other message boards. If I was a new investor and read all of this, I wouldn't even be interested in the science. I find something else to invest in.
My entire post was about the people who are losing money right now and publicly bashing the CEO. To me, it makes no sense. It only serves to make the return on your investment less.
PG, you've said Koos reads this board. How would you feel if your name is being dragged through the dirt by people who are threatening legal action? You tend to start not caring about your investors and do whats in your best interest. If he covers himself legally, the investor has no recourse except spending more money in legal fees to get a small percentage of their money back. You are on the short end either way you go.
I'm not taking up for Koos, I don't even know the guy or want to know him. I want the science to come out to help people in need. If I can make a profit off of this, that would be even better. I can't make a profit if the people in charge of the company are feeling threatened. It will prolong the science making it out to help people if the company doesn't have the value it needs to proceed. At present, even if we get FDA approval, the PPS will not bounce as high as it could because of the skepticism about the management of the company. The skepticism is on display here and other message boards. If I was a new investor and read all of this, I wouldn't even be interested in the science. I find something else to invest in.
(0)
(0)