Here's a link to the map TD has been boasting abou

Here's a link to the map TD has been boasting about the GOB claiming SJ3 a dry hole. Notice on the legend the same symbol is used for "dry hole" and for "N/A". When I pointed this out, his reply was: "I did find that odd as well and odd they would use the same symbol for two different designations. The explanation I got was that the n/a was for old wells that they had no data on from the 50's and 60's and since they obviously never produced a drop of oil have been classified as dry holes. It is possible that Treaty has not provided the information that the GOB requested and has not, and the GOB has after over 5 months gone ahead and designated it a dry hole."
When asked who explained this to him or proof of explanation I get asked where's my proof. LoL
Desperate times calls for desperate measures it seems.
Enjoy

http://estpu.gov.bz/images/GPD/Geophysical/Se...Belize.pdf