Posted On: 09/13/2013 4:15:38 PM
Post# of 8059
the hearing scheduled for Sept 16 is based on the apparently false premise (unless CWRN attorney was on vacation) that Geo had repeatedly notified CWRN's attorney of demand for another deposition and that CWRNs attorney had not responded.
So upon receiving the certified letter notice of hearing,if in fact said letter was real and not a fabrication, CWRN's attorney should notify the court it had not received the claimed notices,or if the att was on vacation,note that, and if the required statutory notice for the hearing-usually 5-10 business days- was not complied with,note that and reschedule if necessary.
However,having noted this was the 1st notice CWRN had received of another demand for deposition, (another dep would be somewhat unusual and unexpected), notify the court of their willingness to allow another deposition at a reasonable time,thereby making the hearing to compel discovery moot-thus cancelling any such hearing.
So upon receiving the certified letter notice of hearing,if in fact said letter was real and not a fabrication, CWRN's attorney should notify the court it had not received the claimed notices,or if the att was on vacation,note that, and if the required statutory notice for the hearing-usually 5-10 business days- was not complied with,note that and reschedule if necessary.
However,having noted this was the 1st notice CWRN had received of another demand for deposition, (another dep would be somewhat unusual and unexpected), notify the court of their willingness to allow another deposition at a reasonable time,thereby making the hearing to compel discovery moot-thus cancelling any such hearing.
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼