Ok, sure, how about us starting the discussion with the rather mysterious significance of the $0.41, $0.041 or the $0.0041 price level? Care to debate?

Lets talk about why over the years there have seemingly been so many "fat finger" trades at the $0.41 price point; seemingly out of no where while the stock was trading at sub penny levels. Lets talk about why for over a month in 2011 just before the SEC litigation news the price of $0.041 was the average share price which persisted. Lets talk about why on July 1 2011, after the news came out the MMs tanked the share price down from the $0.041 level a day earlier down to an exact intraday low of $0.0041.

Hmmmm? Hmmmm....

Sure, lets all talk about it, I'm sure many would like to understand the significance of it all. Care to join the debate? Hmmmm? I guess perhaps it could just be another unhealthy obsession with a particular number, like the number 23, ehhh?