Let me help everyone understand something else....

For argument sake lets pretend the petitioners had valid judgments, and the company was founded on fraud.

Right now TECO is a oil and gas company with revenue and nowhere close to being a fraud, as the many videos and pictures I have posted demonstrate resoundingly.

If all that were true, it wouldn't make a difference in outcome anyway. Why Bull

Because it's incumbent on the Judge protect the public interest as best possible.  8000 shareholders is a light-year away from 7 petitioners.

Cases like this have been heard many times before. The questions are this to make a ruling,

1. Is the company currently fraudulent? NO

What's in the best public interest? Protecting the assets of 8000 shareholders.

A BK 7 entry would destroy all value of TECO's common shares.

Is that in the best interest of the public?