Posted On: 04/17/2013 6:54:14 PM
Post# of 45510
Any one see John's post over there? This sums it up nicely!
john12341
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:07:35 PM
Re: None
Post # of 100675
here is what I see on the growth of the company through the revs. nobody looks closely all they see are numbers I have done the math for everybody . here take a look and see the growth through the revenue increase.
2012
1st q 9,423
2nd q 10,800
3rd q 50,456
4th q 124,321
total 195,000
now we will look at this first three quarters of 2012 total for 2011 and total for 2010
1st q 9,423
2nd q 10,800
3rd q 50,456
total 70,679
1,2,3,q,2012 70,679
--total 2011 30,666
--total 2010 14,089
total 115,434
now with that said the forth quarter of 2012 beats the last two years plus the first three quarters of 2012 by 8,887 I will take that any day. we cant complain about that. here is the math for the final answer of 8,887.
4th q of 2012
124,321
total for last two years plus fist three q of 2012 -115,434
8,887
so now with all this info how can anybody say we are not under valued here. jmo but numbers don't lie
john12341
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:07:35 PM
Re: None
Post # of 100675
here is what I see on the growth of the company through the revs. nobody looks closely all they see are numbers I have done the math for everybody . here take a look and see the growth through the revenue increase.
2012
1st q 9,423
2nd q 10,800
3rd q 50,456
4th q 124,321
total 195,000
now we will look at this first three quarters of 2012 total for 2011 and total for 2010
1st q 9,423
2nd q 10,800
3rd q 50,456
total 70,679
1,2,3,q,2012 70,679
--total 2011 30,666
--total 2010 14,089
total 115,434
now with that said the forth quarter of 2012 beats the last two years plus the first three quarters of 2012 by 8,887 I will take that any day. we cant complain about that. here is the math for the final answer of 8,887.
4th q of 2012
124,321
total for last two years plus fist three q of 2012 -115,434
8,887
so now with all this info how can anybody say we are not under valued here. jmo but numbers don't lie
(0)
(0)
