(Total Views: 328)
Posted On: 10/04/2025 5:51:42 PM
Post# of 157730
Re: Evil Rabbit #157627
What is allowed IMO is constructive criticism, i.e., we need someone dedicated to just visiting the trial sites to drum up patients. We could use clicks directed right to "our" trials with our info without have to do squat. You click on LL, you get our trial and how to sign up, the with CYDY, CytoDyn, CCR5, etc.
What I absolutely hate is reading someone say, "they won't let me post any criticism" gripe, gripe gripe, without saying what you are critical of, without saying how you would like to see things done better, without explaining what you are complaining about. That is soft bashing to drive the SP down enough for you to cover. It is always followed by the GLTA or some such bull. You want to gripe from your Mom's basement, go to another board.
BTW, judging from what has happened and from this last letter my only explanation for the silence and finally the letter is we are in major negotiations and still are, and that got held up by all the cuts to NIH clinical research.
What I absolutely hate is reading someone say, "they won't let me post any criticism" gripe, gripe gripe, without saying what you are critical of, without saying how you would like to see things done better, without explaining what you are complaining about. That is soft bashing to drive the SP down enough for you to cover. It is always followed by the GLTA or some such bull. You want to gripe from your Mom's basement, go to another board.
BTW, judging from what has happened and from this last letter my only explanation for the silence and finally the letter is we are in major negotiations and still are, and that got held up by all the cuts to NIH clinical research.
(9)
(0)
