I do sincerely appreciate your reply. I found value in the dialogue concerning the roles of docs & different institutions as well. As much as the science is important, the human element is to be considered.
Ohm, while I am nowhere close to being as smart as you, I will agree that "risk adverse" is a much better way of putting things.
You are legend. 9 likes in a couple of hours. On the flip side, we have 5 sites & less than 5 enrolled in a couple of months.
Now it is being suggested that it is the protocol that is slowing things down.
Or maybe that people are not sick enough or dying quick enough to merit a lifeline. Then it is suggested that they are turning it down. What gives?
No worries, the bus will be coming by soon. Who goes under next?
But thanks, as I find value in your communications.