I want to commend a poster for pushing back a little on Dalton’s latest LinkedIn post. It takes guts to point out that UNVC has been recycling the same language for years without showing verifiable execution. The comment cut through the hype and basically said what many of us have been thinking: all the talk about mental health, telehealth, opioid treatment, and wraparound services has been repeated endlessly with no hard evidence yet.

I also noticed another commenter chimed in with a good point about scrutiny not being tolerated, and that’s true. Dalton has been known to delete or ignore comments that aren’t overly optimistic or showering him with praise. That’s not how transparency is supposed to work for a public company. Shareholders shouldn’t feel like their only option is blind cheerleading — constructive criticism and tough questions are part of accountability.

So credit where it’s due: it was refreshing to see someone on LinkedIn voice what so many long-term holders have felt. The company can’t just survive on visionary language forever. If Dalton really wants to prove the naysayers wrong, it won’t be through deleting comments — it’ll be through filings, hard evidence, and execution.