(Total Views: 646)
Posted On: 08/13/2025 7:16:57 AM
Post# of 155763
Re: KenChowder #155736
How's that a damper -- not even close & actually the news only says .....in 2025
I've actually said I wonder if we were going to reduce non-prioriy trials to save LL, after mTNBC 36+ came out
LATCH has never been a top favorite personally
But it's funny you commented because yesterday this made me think about your LL occupancy reply.
Popped up in a general search & maybe little bit of interesting to you -- or maybe not.....
Absorption
A 162mg subcutaneous dose reaches a Cmax of 6.1mg/L, with a Tmax of 32 hours, and an AUC of 24.4mg*day/L.2
A 324mg subcutaneous dose reaches a Cmax of 13.8mg/L, with a Tmax of 56 hours, and an AUC of 58.8mg*day/L.2
I've actually said I wonder if we were going to reduce non-prioriy trials to save LL, after mTNBC 36+ came out
LATCH has never been a top favorite personally
But it's funny you commented because yesterday this made me think about your LL occupancy reply.
Popped up in a general search & maybe little bit of interesting to you -- or maybe not.....
Absorption
A 162mg subcutaneous dose reaches a Cmax of 6.1mg/L, with a Tmax of 32 hours, and an AUC of 24.4mg*day/L.2
A 324mg subcutaneous dose reaches a Cmax of 13.8mg/L, with a Tmax of 56 hours, and an AUC of 58.8mg*day/L.2
(3)
(0)
