You asked a great question but…. buried it under a bad punchline.

You’re absolutely right that vaccines without preservatives must still guarantee sterility, especially in multi dose formats. That’s why thimerosal and similar compounds were used in the first place.

But let’s be clear!!!

(Single-dose, preservative-free vaccines exist)

(They’re safer, more modern, and cost more not because they’re better, but because they’re inconvenient for the system.)

So the real issue isn’t thimerosal vs. autism. It’s this… and then we can stop defending the FDA…

Why is the burden on you to ask for a clean vial, rather than the system delivering one by default?

And as for the RFK jab.

No one needs to trust his past to validate the questions he’s asking now.

If being a recovering addict disqualifies someone from criticizing chemical exposure, then I guess we should stop hiring former smokers to fight lung cancer too, right?

You don’t need to like the messenger. But mocking him won’t make the system cleaner. Yes I’ve mocked him myself. Yet I’m holding him accountable for the changes he said he would make.