(Total Views: 625)
Posted On: 04/22/2025 12:16:28 AM
Post# of 154635
“My guess is that the FDA may remove industry reps from advisory committees that existed prior to 1997.”
*As of 1997, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee and Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee were also active.
"When I got his nomination for the job, I cannot tell you how many lobbyists, former members of Congress, the swamp, reached out to me,” offering to write letters on behalf of their companies to the senators on the confirmation committee. “You know what I said? Don’t talk to the senators. I don’t want your letters. They’re not for free. Those are obligations that then you feel indebted to return once you’re in office.”
____
We could truly be legally free of bad actors @ the FDA in regards to our Oncology & solid tumors.
I now think Dr. J's March comments on FDA has more meaning....
https://www.biospace.com/fda/banning-industry...ainst-cois
*As of 1997, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee and Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee were also active.
"When I got his nomination for the job, I cannot tell you how many lobbyists, former members of Congress, the swamp, reached out to me,” offering to write letters on behalf of their companies to the senators on the confirmation committee. “You know what I said? Don’t talk to the senators. I don’t want your letters. They’re not for free. Those are obligations that then you feel indebted to return once you’re in office.”
____
We could truly be legally free of bad actors @ the FDA in regards to our Oncology & solid tumors.
I now think Dr. J's March comments on FDA has more meaning....
https://www.biospace.com/fda/banning-industry...ainst-cois
(5)
(0)
