Not much you know, that much is certain. Give you capital to take one of your companies that is "upside down" public? No. No thanks, not interested in any business which has a leader of whom thinks that a business plan is a small post-it wish list of generic end state goals, like, "become profitable", "achieve margins", "break even" and "increase revenues". Laughable. Actually along those lines, if I were to jot down on the back of an envelope similar goal states and hopes to a bank to get a loan to start up a business, I likely would get laughed out onto the street. You might as well make your "business plan" more grandiose, such as, "1. Make more money than Bill Gates", "2. Take over the world of business in all respects", "3. IPO with a quadrillion dollar business". I should think many of your investors, if you even had any in the first place may ask you to "..put together a revised plan...". 
My question is why you are so adamant about dumping on RFMK each and every day, here and elsewhere. Hmmmm. I don't "get it". Perhaps you are the one from the past which declared war on RFMK and the executives??!! How many internet message board handles do you have anyway?
If you would like to compare apples to apples in terms of business performance then feel free to provide growth rates, revenues/sales, balance sheets for all of the ecig companies in existence and we can really compare and judge who is performing best. The problem of course is that we cannot, because most of the ecig businesses are private and RFMK is basically one of only about two publicly traded ecig companies, so we do not have very much information as a basis for comparison, besides your conjecture and speculations about your future hypothetical corporations you are supposedly going to take public so easily. Every one of your complaints against RFMK is just baseless speculative musings for which we have no basis for comparison of performance metrics. It would be nice to be able to use the other MMJ stocks to compare performance against, but alas, none of them have ecigs as their core business model so there is nothing for us investors to judge against. We can make opinionated claims and reviews of how we see the various ecigs stacking up against each other in the market like in your other post, but without actually comparing the feature sets and pros and cons of each device it is difficult to gain insight into the differences. It is almost impossible to assume we can predict how the market of vaporizer consumers are going to behave with all of these new products hitting the market. Actually I see that RFMK has put out two new devices in a year and now they are soon going to put out a dry herb vaporizer. In the same amount of time I am looking for new devices by the other (private) ecig companies and I am not really seeing anything new, just the same old generic Chinese knock offs like the Omicrons and the GPens. Go ask Gary boy if he has the capital keep up with RFMK and produce a brand new unique device every year working exclusively with a manufacturing and design company like HexCorp, he will likely just look at you wide-eyed and then cry and pout in the corner.
GLTY, you are going to need it.
TIC TOC
$RFMK!
