How is direct contact with a public company’s attorney as a shareholder perceived in the legal arena? How would a shareholder be able to get access to and share private information (text/email /conversation) coming from a ceo of a publicly traded company or its corporate attorney? Just a general question here.

No matter who you believe is right or wrong in the Moss site visit incident, it’s very clear about publicly traded company information being shared with a known shareholder and has admittedly bought and sold and profited significantly (self-admittedly).

Someone got way too close and now needs to deflect to avoid becoming a target of any investigation as promoter of all failed projects at the same time profiting from buying and selling the stock.

in my opinion

cheers