(Total Views: 99)
Posted On: 10/04/2024 5:01:28 PM
Post# of 13036
my take on the state of Moss et al affairs
Way too close, in nature, for contacting Moss about the same subject. Not sure who contacted Moss first.
I'm really hoping Dakota is not lil Jimmy. Dakota would never call people names like lil jimmy has on his twitter page.
In the end, I guess we need to know if there was any contract between Moss' client and Snpw prior to any contact with Moss. It didn't appear so. No 8-K. Perhaps, the photoshopping triggered such contact too. It would appear the company would have a more difficult if the contact was made by a shareholder. Especially, after company's Q2 10-Q in 2023 finally revealed an end to the Elba facility/property PPA instead of being disclosed in an 8-K months earlier.
Company, obviously, can't be trusted and I would say, the contact with Moss, following the company's promoting of another site visit (with no prior disclosures), would not be surprising. The content of the messages, during contact, could be an issue. However, I don't know first hand all of the communications.
But, the company would have so much more to also explain (it might not to want to have to explain or try and prove) in any legal proceeding when going after a disgruntled message board poster/shareholder. Call me crazy, but such an event would go very public with a potential story about a miserably failed and broke company, in serious debt, bad history, huge convertible shares stock dilution to raise capital that resulted in zero cash just 2-3 years later, a 4000:1 reverse split when not needed, terminated contracts, subsidiary taken by ceo.
I see a lot of risk on the company's part. Possible huge backfiring. Only IMHO, there's probably so much behind the scenes stuff that would be forced to the forefront and made public following a legal battle of this sort.
also remember, I'm on record with my opinion of "lil jimmy" as being the "biggest idiot" on snpw's message boards. he really has become just another clown in the circus.
just my 2 cents.
back to trying to explain NOT A SINGLE DOLLAR OF SOLAR PRODUCT SALES IN 7 YEARS OF BUSINESS WHILE LABELING ITSELF A SOLAR CONGLOMERATE CHANGING THE WORLD.
in my opinion
cheers
Quote:
Remember Dakota shared with us the e-mail he received from Campanella accusing him of Tortious Interference for his e-mail to Moss, associating Moss of being part of a possible SEC fraud investigation do to his association with Campanella.
Jimmy on the other hand is a whole different level., It is alleged Jimmy represented himself as a legal authority actively investigating Campanella and SNPW for SEC Security fraud and actually threaten Moss with the subpoenaing of his e-mails and phone records if he did not cooperate
Way too close, in nature, for contacting Moss about the same subject. Not sure who contacted Moss first.
I'm really hoping Dakota is not lil Jimmy. Dakota would never call people names like lil jimmy has on his twitter page.
In the end, I guess we need to know if there was any contract between Moss' client and Snpw prior to any contact with Moss. It didn't appear so. No 8-K. Perhaps, the photoshopping triggered such contact too. It would appear the company would have a more difficult if the contact was made by a shareholder. Especially, after company's Q2 10-Q in 2023 finally revealed an end to the Elba facility/property PPA instead of being disclosed in an 8-K months earlier.
Company, obviously, can't be trusted and I would say, the contact with Moss, following the company's promoting of another site visit (with no prior disclosures), would not be surprising. The content of the messages, during contact, could be an issue. However, I don't know first hand all of the communications.
But, the company would have so much more to also explain (it might not to want to have to explain or try and prove) in any legal proceeding when going after a disgruntled message board poster/shareholder. Call me crazy, but such an event would go very public with a potential story about a miserably failed and broke company, in serious debt, bad history, huge convertible shares stock dilution to raise capital that resulted in zero cash just 2-3 years later, a 4000:1 reverse split when not needed, terminated contracts, subsidiary taken by ceo.
I see a lot of risk on the company's part. Possible huge backfiring. Only IMHO, there's probably so much behind the scenes stuff that would be forced to the forefront and made public following a legal battle of this sort.
also remember, I'm on record with my opinion of "lil jimmy" as being the "biggest idiot" on snpw's message boards. he really has become just another clown in the circus.
just my 2 cents.
back to trying to explain NOT A SINGLE DOLLAR OF SOLAR PRODUCT SALES IN 7 YEARS OF BUSINESS WHILE LABELING ITSELF A SOLAR CONGLOMERATE CHANGING THE WORLD.
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
