Quote:

---

The existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party;(contact known with Elba Property, FoxEss, and GEP Solar)

The defendant having knowledge of the contract; (all contracts were public information)

The defendant intentionally and unjustifiably inducing the third party to breach the contract; (Before contacting FoxEss USA SPPC listed as a global partner after SPPPC removed from the offical FoxEss website) Before company made claims of Tortuous Interference , company claimed that Reverse was was no longer needed after 4000 to1 RS enacted)

The occurrence of the breach resulting from the defendant's conduct; and Damages (Funding for Elba plant failed to happen, SPPC lost it designation as a global partner on the official FoxEss website, ).

---