(Total Views: 877)
Posted On: 06/27/2024 9:05:42 AM
Post# of 144839
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
In regards to SMC Laboratories, they appear to have been heavily involved in Mash/Nash trials in mice.
From their website:
"SMC Laboratories is highly regarded worldwide as a consulting CRO that designs studies in line with the demands of pharmaceutical companies and research institutions. In particular, in the MASH/NASH field, SMC is a highly regarded CRO, because of our unique STAMâ„¢ mice. The results achieved with our STAMâ„¢ have been introduced in academic publications as well as scientific conferences."
Then they have a list of publications and poster presentations listed that utilized their research here:
https://www.smccro-lab.com/publication/
I'm not going to go through them myself, but I wonder if they were responsible for any of Madrigal's mice trials? It would be nice to know we're in the same hands, but even if not they seem like a great choice. And it's about time Cytodyn experiences the other end of the bell curve when it comes to their CRO choices.
From their website:
"SMC Laboratories is highly regarded worldwide as a consulting CRO that designs studies in line with the demands of pharmaceutical companies and research institutions. In particular, in the MASH/NASH field, SMC is a highly regarded CRO, because of our unique STAMâ„¢ mice. The results achieved with our STAMâ„¢ have been introduced in academic publications as well as scientific conferences."
Then they have a list of publications and poster presentations listed that utilized their research here:
https://www.smccro-lab.com/publication/
I'm not going to go through them myself, but I wonder if they were responsible for any of Madrigal's mice trials? It would be nice to know we're in the same hands, but even if not they seem like a great choice. And it's about time Cytodyn experiences the other end of the bell curve when it comes to their CRO choices.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)