(Total Views: 115)
Posted On: 06/12/2024 12:39:14 AM
Post# of 13169
And you are speculating as well. My speculation has no downside, yours has tremendous downside.
Tortuous is very difficult to prove, especially for one that is insolvent reporting zero revenue in the last filing. Very hard to prove it was a result of interference.
Again you are speculating that Solray Inc is or will not be a part of SNPW?
Who knows time might prove you right but until then it only speculation.
And since we are speculating.
As discussed previously fiduciary responsibility is to protect the interest of its shareholders.
IF the alleged Tortuous interference by a few posters was the cause for the company's financing to be delayed or terms of the agreement altered resulting in the triggering the need for a 4000 to 1 RS, would it not be serving the best interest of the shareholders to be silent running at this time? https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=174584276
Tortuous is very difficult to prove, especially for one that is insolvent reporting zero revenue in the last filing. Very hard to prove it was a result of interference.
Again you are speculating that Solray Inc is or will not be a part of SNPW?
Who knows time might prove you right but until then it only speculation.
And since we are speculating.
As discussed previously fiduciary responsibility is to protect the interest of its shareholders.
IF the alleged Tortuous interference by a few posters was the cause for the company's financing to be delayed or terms of the agreement altered resulting in the triggering the need for a 4000 to 1 RS, would it not be serving the best interest of the shareholders to be silent running at this time? https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=174584276
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
