(Total Views: 92)
Posted On: 05/30/2024 12:50:59 PM
Post# of 13180
NO FILING MENTIONING SOLRAY?? NO 8-K??
any dealings or agreements between the two conflicting/competing entities have NOT been disclosed by the public company, Snpw.
As a publicly traded company Snpw should have filed an 8-K no later than 5 calendar days following the date Snpw knew of any any agreement or co-mingling amongst individuals representing both Solray and Sun Pacific Power/Snpw.
5 calendar days, NO MORE "WHEN WE"RE READY". What a joke!!
same runaway freight train doing things behind the scenes and how it benefits insiders versus shareholders in the dark. Travesty!!
SEC has to be aware of what has played out, especially, between the individuals colluding as representatives of both entities. One being a public traded company which is delinquent with its SEC filings/disclosures.
in my opinion
cheers
any dealings or agreements between the two conflicting/competing entities have NOT been disclosed by the public company, Snpw.
As a publicly traded company Snpw should have filed an 8-K no later than 5 calendar days following the date Snpw knew of any any agreement or co-mingling amongst individuals representing both Solray and Sun Pacific Power/Snpw.
5 calendar days, NO MORE "WHEN WE"RE READY". What a joke!!
same runaway freight train doing things behind the scenes and how it benefits insiders versus shareholders in the dark. Travesty!!
SEC has to be aware of what has played out, especially, between the individuals colluding as representatives of both entities. One being a public traded company which is delinquent with its SEC filings/disclosures.
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
