(Total Views: 89)
Posted On: 05/10/2024 11:03:26 AM
Post# of 13181
Re: Wallstreet1234 #7810
You forget to take in to consideration that without the new law the company would had a chance to address each and every one of the citizens concerns and rectified them.
Section 2
If 1,2 and 3 were issues they were issues known to the RI-DEM before they did the final review (AS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN) they should have been addressed by the RI-DEM before doing their FINAL REVIEW OD THE APPLICATION..
Yet, RI-DEM did not think they were an issues when they did their FINAL REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION submitted by SNPW
In addition if not for the new law Section 2 items 1,2 and 3 could have been addreesed by the company and rectified, but because of the new law the company was not given a chance to do so.
Section 2
If 1,2 and 3 were issues they were issues known to the RI-DEM before they did the final review (AS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN) they should have been addressed by the RI-DEM before doing their FINAL REVIEW OD THE APPLICATION..
Yet, RI-DEM did not think they were an issues when they did their FINAL REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION submitted by SNPW
In addition if not for the new law Section 2 items 1,2 and 3 could have been addreesed by the company and rectified, but because of the new law the company was not given a chance to do so.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
