(Total Views: 97)
Posted On: 05/06/2024 2:23:29 PM
Post# of 13035
Re: wassabi_21 #7662
from 5,000' looks like a civil matter, and what about this??
- what business?
- is there any business taking place between Dillon, SC property owner and Sun Pacific Power?
- is this "so-called" business taking place between Dillon, SC property owner and Solray?
- what agreement?
- is the ceo promoting Solray (ceo's new side company) business opportunities as Sun Pacific Holding business, since Solray has been set up prior to any of the calls to business partners and/or property owners/agents?
- is the ceo promoting Solray (ceo's new side company) team members, on a website, also known participants, in Sun Pacific Holding's "so called" business (GEP & Dillon, SC property), in the same industry (specific space-solar panel manufacturing and ESS)
- what was said or asked to interfere with business?
was, what was said, true?
was, what was said or asked, considered due diligence/discovery, as a shareholder or former shareholder, part of civil legal action, against a public company and/or its ceo, as a plaintiff seeking damages?
was, what was said, deemed important knowledge for a business partner/property owner/or property owner's agent to, in order to protect its business reputation or to protect a property owners' published listing?
Maybe, worry more about a public company publishing photoshopped images in the public domain without a disclaimer?
Maybe, worry more about a public company not publishing its financial status and disclosures, from 5 to 7 months ago, keeping shareholders/investors in the dark, as a convenience for insiders.
in my opinion
cheers
- what business?
- is there any business taking place between Dillon, SC property owner and Sun Pacific Power?
- is this "so-called" business taking place between Dillon, SC property owner and Solray?
- what agreement?
- is the ceo promoting Solray (ceo's new side company) business opportunities as Sun Pacific Holding business, since Solray has been set up prior to any of the calls to business partners and/or property owners/agents?
- is the ceo promoting Solray (ceo's new side company) team members, on a website, also known participants, in Sun Pacific Holding's "so called" business (GEP & Dillon, SC property), in the same industry (specific space-solar panel manufacturing and ESS)
- what was said or asked to interfere with business?
was, what was said, true?
was, what was said or asked, considered due diligence/discovery, as a shareholder or former shareholder, part of civil legal action, against a public company and/or its ceo, as a plaintiff seeking damages?
was, what was said, deemed important knowledge for a business partner/property owner/or property owner's agent to, in order to protect its business reputation or to protect a property owners' published listing?
Maybe, worry more about a public company publishing photoshopped images in the public domain without a disclaimer?
Maybe, worry more about a public company not publishing its financial status and disclosures, from 5 to 7 months ago, keeping shareholders/investors in the dark, as a convenience for insiders.
in my opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
