(Total Views: 939)
Posted On: 04/19/2024 2:12:51 AM
Post# of 148878
*Exibit E:
April 27th, 2020
Page says 20 of 44
Dr. J e-mailed Fredrick Hayden & made it clear about LL.
Hayden was the Gilead consultant on the Safety Brd.
Dr. J CC'd clinton & gates foundations & included Cytodyn people
*Exhibit G:
FDA saying"Complete BLA" news release total lie & mentions why. Said if they think it's complete, could a RTF notice that day.
*Exhibit J:
Shows the collab with other depts on the BLA decisions, & instructions to KK, although saying it's laced with "
definicies)" .....but they thank others for helping
Horrible exhibit for Amarex
*Exhibit G, page 2 of 2:
Pulling back on EINDs so can enroll into trials
*Exhibit H April 19th, 2020 e-mail:
Dr. J pushed back to Murray about judging Cytodyn harshly
That was followed by the gag with spoon replies, to Murray.
*June 5th, 2024 trial starts
* Exhibit J e-mail.
April 27th, 2020.
Dr. J's outstanding covid e-mail to
Gates, Clinton & others.
On e-mail, Murray offered to also send to WHO.
Followed by internal e-mail frwd'd to co-workers:
" Gag me with a spoon. Why is Linda Lewis on the cc list. This is all worthless data. Unless i see controled data, i will never ever believe it"
So far, that is the only known line of thinking from him & it's not criminal, per say.
* Exhibit K
April 29th, 2020.
When NP pr'd a complete BLA was filed. She not only internaly talked about how it was a lie, but this is a very key comment ----
" Total lies, they did not submit any clinical datasets & they are not expected until May".
So telling shareholders it's "complete", & AHEAD of the extra timeframe they were given.
They for no reason, lied, in advance.
Her comment continues:
"Technically, they should have only submitted module 5 when it was complete with datasets. They still havent given us the DSMB charter. DSMB meeting minutes, (open session & closed session), analysis results/reports presented to DSMB --- we've asked for this multiple times. I'll need to call them today to explain tge clock has not started and they dont have a complete submission. If they think the submission is complete we can send a refusal to file letter today".
Based on that NP press release, RTF letter if FDA was truly treating them with intent/malice, was warranted. But in all their e-mail "insults" so far, they never talk about intentionally delaying, etc.. Always mention what is missing, incorrect, instructing, have offered step by step clarity & many things on repeat. No wonder structured settlement talks to start.
These e-mails are only getting worse for Amarex & not supporting his --- "yea, i watched the dog eat my homework, but you should've helped me".
BLA was a disaster & FDA thought LL would do harm in covid. Even Dr. J & Patterson said during covid--- FDA simply dosen't understand LL.
These e-mails only show Amarex owing Cytodyn more & more in damages. Hell, FDA even questioned his duties to Cytodyn!
Eventually all this bullshit will come to pass
Shall see.....
April 27th, 2020
Page says 20 of 44
Dr. J e-mailed Fredrick Hayden & made it clear about LL.
Hayden was the Gilead consultant on the Safety Brd.
Dr. J CC'd clinton & gates foundations & included Cytodyn people
*Exhibit G:
FDA saying"Complete BLA" news release total lie & mentions why. Said if they think it's complete, could a RTF notice that day.
*Exhibit J:
Shows the collab with other depts on the BLA decisions, & instructions to KK, although saying it's laced with "
definicies)" .....but they thank others for helping Horrible exhibit for Amarex
*Exhibit G, page 2 of 2:
Pulling back on EINDs so can enroll into trials
*Exhibit H April 19th, 2020 e-mail:
Dr. J pushed back to Murray about judging Cytodyn harshly
That was followed by the gag with spoon replies, to Murray.
*June 5th, 2024 trial starts
* Exhibit J e-mail.
April 27th, 2020.
Dr. J's outstanding covid e-mail to
Gates, Clinton & others.
On e-mail, Murray offered to also send to WHO.
Followed by internal e-mail frwd'd to co-workers:
" Gag me with a spoon. Why is Linda Lewis on the cc list. This is all worthless data. Unless i see controled data, i will never ever believe it"
So far, that is the only known line of thinking from him & it's not criminal, per say.
* Exhibit K
April 29th, 2020.
When NP pr'd a complete BLA was filed. She not only internaly talked about how it was a lie, but this is a very key comment ----
" Total lies, they did not submit any clinical datasets & they are not expected until May".
So telling shareholders it's "complete", & AHEAD of the extra timeframe they were given.
They for no reason, lied, in advance.
Her comment continues:
"Technically, they should have only submitted module 5 when it was complete with datasets. They still havent given us the DSMB charter. DSMB meeting minutes, (open session & closed session), analysis results/reports presented to DSMB --- we've asked for this multiple times. I'll need to call them today to explain tge clock has not started and they dont have a complete submission. If they think the submission is complete we can send a refusal to file letter today".
Based on that NP press release, RTF letter if FDA was truly treating them with intent/malice, was warranted. But in all their e-mail "insults" so far, they never talk about intentionally delaying, etc.. Always mention what is missing, incorrect, instructing, have offered step by step clarity & many things on repeat. No wonder structured settlement talks to start.
These e-mails are only getting worse for Amarex & not supporting his --- "yea, i watched the dog eat my homework, but you should've helped me".
BLA was a disaster & FDA thought LL would do harm in covid. Even Dr. J & Patterson said during covid--- FDA simply dosen't understand LL.
These e-mails only show Amarex owing Cytodyn more & more in damages. Hell, FDA even questioned his duties to Cytodyn!
Eventually all this bullshit will come to pass
Shall see.....
(12)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
