I wonder why the New York Times nor any other publication, while printing several stories about Romano and the Mask Case as they followed it though the court system, NEVER mentioned Campanella name again?

Maybe because he wasn't guilty of any crimes involving that case?

There were no follow up stories of a plea bargain agreement?

No follow up stories of charges dropped in lean of testimony?

No follow up stories of Campanella and his involvement in the case involvement at all?

There has been plenty of follow up stories about the case and Romano, yet not another word mentioned about Campanella.

I guess no proof of any wrong doing don't sell newspapers.