And yet you keep ignoring me about the fact that the former CEO of NSF told us he would look into it, did not make Amarex turn over our data, and were therefore complicit. At the point he was made aware of it, whether he actually looked into it or not, he was complicit if he didn't correct it, which he did not according to the judge that told them to give us our data. Continuing to parrot this indemnity clause when I've given you clear reason to see that they would no longer be covered by it makes you look disingenuous.