(Total Views: 103)
Posted On: 02/08/2024 11:22:30 PM
Post# of 13135
Re: ThreeEmInEn #6180
Again a misrepresentation of what I said.
I said the pictures do not match 2251 Old Curtis Rd UNLESS the seller was required to make improvements.
If BiGJ did the due diligence.it is no wonder you got it wrong.
But that doesn't change the fact that no promotion from the company has mentioned SC as the new site.
Quote:
Too bad you're on record saying it was 2251 Old Curtis Rd after some improvements
I said the pictures do not match 2251 Old Curtis Rd UNLESS the seller was required to make improvements.
If BiGJ did the due diligence.it is no wonder you got it wrong.
But that doesn't change the fact that no promotion from the company has mentioned SC as the new site.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
