(Total Views: 72)
Posted On: 12/07/2023 9:40:56 AM
Post# of 7110

Open: initially 6.4M at .0006 - then, as usual, when ask not hit immediately from orders placed before the open, scammer(s) stacked the ask to 28.4M in an attempt to dupe the impatient / tax loss sellers to trade on their 83.8M bid.
However, for a tax loss to count, traders must not have bought any cheaper than the ones they are selling in the last 30 days and then can't buy any back for a further 30 days. Even if the impatient planned ahead, they would be stupid to think $SFLM isn't going to get run up at some point in the next 60 days.
However, for a tax loss to count, traders must not have bought any cheaper than the ones they are selling in the last 30 days and then can't buy any back for a further 30 days. Even if the impatient planned ahead, they would be stupid to think $SFLM isn't going to get run up at some point in the next 60 days.


"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.