When ever there is any thing spoken from the company, I document it word for word. I transcribe it exactly as it was said.

I do a lot of other writing as well, which is mostly rationalization, conjecture and speculation. I try to indicate that throughout the document. Reasoned Argument you can call it.

Here BiloxiBlue indicated he had actual text message conversations with CA. Although he indicated CA never would divulge information privy only to insiders, certainly, some distaste was conveyed and a sentiment of regret was conveyed.

Then, saying he is out very soon in reaction and that given his long tenure here for over 10 years, maybe other longs should follow him even down here.

Let's consider the post true, what good did it serve? To save what ever is left?

What if the post is false, what good did it serve? Wouldn't the harm even be greater by causing longs like him to abandon ship and possibly lose out on what they were waiting for all along.

The post was made as if it actually happened. It was not spelled out as conjecture or hypothetical. When it is stated as such, in needs to be spelled out precisely and exactly and consideration needs to be made as to its impact and consequential value.