One wonders why sour apple cyder is so bent on telling us that the amount CYDY will come away with from the Amarex litigation is less than one quarter of the amount that the company itself has told us they are asking for.

No matter how much his posts cite the perceived microtechnicalities of Maryland law, this is straight bashing, period. The only possible motivation for it would be a wish to drive the share price down.

He's pro-Pestell (if not Pestell himself) and pro-Amarex (if not Craig himself), and his interests do not align with ours.