(Total Views: 121)
Posted On: 09/18/2023 4:02:47 PM
Post# of 13177
Re: ThreeEmInEn #5106
I provided my proof, NO SEC charges or claims that the quote SNPW used from PT.IDN Solar Tech was erroneous or False.And no denial rebuttal from PT.IDN either IN OVER A YEAR.
If that was so about no HO,
One would think Kazi would go
to the sec and begin to crow
PT.IDN Solar had no HO
With no SEC action that we know
tells us Kazi is wrong about Mr Ho
Half- truths Kazi has been proven to throw
To hinder SNPW potential to grow
Posting a quote that is not real, oh no
Would cost the company plenty of dough
yet again that didn't happen that we KNOW!
another failed attempt by Kazi to strike a blow.
BTW all knowing how much Kazi HATES Campanella does anyone really believe that if Kazi could really prove that there was no HO at PT.IDN at the time of the press release Kazi would not turn Campenalla in to the SEC.
Next misrepresentation,
If that was so about no HO,
One would think Kazi would go
to the sec and begin to crow
PT.IDN Solar had no HO
With no SEC action that we know
tells us Kazi is wrong about Mr Ho
Half- truths Kazi has been proven to throw
To hinder SNPW potential to grow
Posting a quote that is not real, oh no
Would cost the company plenty of dough
yet again that didn't happen that we KNOW!
another failed attempt by Kazi to strike a blow.
BTW all knowing how much Kazi HATES Campanella does anyone really believe that if Kazi could really prove that there was no HO at PT.IDN at the time of the press release Kazi would not turn Campenalla in to the SEC.
Next misrepresentation,
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
