5 year ban -- the bashers are absolutely and completely dead wrong (I know, I know....shocker) 

Right at the top is says this is a CONSENT of judgment and references the 1/23/13 pacer doc. The 1/23/13 pacer doc says 5 year ban is what was consented to. The 3/18/13 order is identical to the 1/23/13 proposed order, in fact, the judge just literally crossed off the word "proposed" and kept the rest of it, copy and paste. The proposed and now final order itself for the judge merely references statues that give the judge the power to make rulings that are in line with the settlement. Even if one attempted to nitpick, the absence of a timeframe in the order would default back to the consent, especially since the 3/18/13 order references the consent without repeating the verbatim but gives the date and case number. Therefore unequivocally this is a 5 year ban.

Lifetime ban is just as fictional as disgorgement. There's none of either.

Did you catch this line by the way?

"wavied findings of fact and conclusions of law"

Looks like Johnik was 100% correct, as usual. The others cases just died a violent death.