hold was enacted because of the 2 SAEs cardiac arrests in brazil...so my question to anyone who would know....when these drug commercials come on every 3 minutes on the teee veee stating their potential side effects, like cancers, liver failures, and death, why were THEIR trials allowed to continue while their lab rat humans were getting cancers, liver failures, and dying? was leronlimab treated fairly or unfairly regarding the hold? how do we compare apples to apples here? asking for a friend who rolled his entire life savings into CYDY...

and if the hold was enacted because the data was unfit to analyze, at what point did the FDA conclude the data was unfit? hadnt the FDA been in countless meetings over how many countless years, going over this very data, where this could have been addressed sooner? seems to me the FDA let this all slip too far into the abyss before calling a hold, this was not a sudden revelation. another reason more than half of us here do not trust the FDA (ex big pharma) to do anything favorable towards cytodyn whatsoever, it all feels like a setup.