(Total Views: 688)
Posted On: 04/12/2023 4:55:41 PM
Post# of 148870
Re: KenChowder #134045
the FDA is no friend
the FDA is certainly dicking. its even more upsetting when we all know that HIV patients took the drug for years with no side effects. yet every single commercial for a drug we hear on the TeeVee warns us that a new breakthrough miracle drug from big pharma can also give us lymphoma, stroke, internal bleeding, cancers and death. but your skin will look great. or your blood will be thinner. or your depression will be diverted into another problem. how did these big pharma drugs get past all the death and destruction when they were in the early stages? we know know the answer to that. to say the FDA is simply doing its job and scrutinizing where scrutiny is justified is downright insulting.
so which is it....either LL is actually safe and effective for HIV and the system will stop at nothing to destroy it - to protect itself or to steal the technology, or the amarex data was so bad that the safety record is useless and we need to start another 10 year multi billion dollar set of trials?
Quote:
Quote: It just seems like this hold has gone from "What did you do and how did you do it/" to "What are you planning to do and how and you going to do it?"
It does seem that way. So why are they asking about protocol? It seems to me that there are only two factors that could change the safety of a drug that's been safe: 1) length of the trial and 2) dosage.
Since some patients have been taking Leron safely for numerous years, the length of a trial could not be a problem.
So the protocol of upcoming tests shouldn't be a question of safety in any way, unless CYDY is planning a trial with a much higher dosage. Assuming the HIV trials to come aren't using a bigger dose, I don't see what the FDA is in truth asking about. Unless it's dicking with us. Government agencies aren't supposed to dick.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=655...z7yhahSQzt
the FDA is certainly dicking. its even more upsetting when we all know that HIV patients took the drug for years with no side effects. yet every single commercial for a drug we hear on the TeeVee warns us that a new breakthrough miracle drug from big pharma can also give us lymphoma, stroke, internal bleeding, cancers and death. but your skin will look great. or your blood will be thinner. or your depression will be diverted into another problem. how did these big pharma drugs get past all the death and destruction when they were in the early stages? we know know the answer to that. to say the FDA is simply doing its job and scrutinizing where scrutiny is justified is downright insulting.
so which is it....either LL is actually safe and effective for HIV and the system will stop at nothing to destroy it - to protect itself or to steal the technology, or the amarex data was so bad that the safety record is useless and we need to start another 10 year multi billion dollar set of trials?
(7)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
