(Total Views: 136)
Posted On: 03/16/2023 4:18:21 PM
Post# of 13838
Yup. And 9 Mil wasted before the statutorily mandated public hearing process.
Some just can't deal with the reality of the definition of a LOI and something "not being final until it's final". The whining and pointing blame is pathetic. Blaming the public when the state has a statute mandating a public hearing process? That's absurd. Better off sticking with the Foxess global partner link that's resulted in zero revenue for almost the first 16 months of that relationship.
Hoping you get some new bipolar tweets to chew on for another month.
in my humble opinion
cheers
Quote:
The Office of Land Revitalization and Sustainable Materials Management (LR&SMM) has reviewed your re-submission dated 8/18/2020 as modified on 11/6/2020, 11/24/2020 and 11/30/2020, and 12/2/2020. The purpose of this letter is to communicate the Department’s intent to approve the license pursuant to R.I.G.L. 23-18.9-9 and this letter is not the issuance of the
facility license at this time. Rather, it is the result of a final review of your application and the initiation of the statutorily mandated public hearing process
Some just can't deal with the reality of the definition of a LOI and something "not being final until it's final". The whining and pointing blame is pathetic. Blaming the public when the state has a statute mandating a public hearing process? That's absurd. Better off sticking with the Foxess global partner link that's resulted in zero revenue for almost the first 16 months of that relationship.
Hoping you get some new bipolar tweets to chew on for another month.
in my humble opinion
cheers
(0)
(0)
