(Total Views: 173)
Posted On: 03/09/2023 11:08:46 AM
Post# of 126644
THE simple fact is that your assertions, implications, that deaths associated with the riot, on BOTH sides, are still not sufficient reasons for you not to condemn what happened.
And no one on this board believes that IF it was an ANTIFA/BLM riot, to overturn a national election, you would be downplaying 'deaths associated'.
Why is your argument based on a distinction that is not a difference? Because the people dead are no less f'ing dead.
The whole f'ing event is way past excuse making. And not a single relative of the people who died gives a flying f'k about moral imbeciles trying to split hairs to diminish the loss of lives.
Imagine your lame ass in front of any of them stating 'at least he didn't die on the day of the riot'. You'd be hit so hard that by the time you stopped rolling your clothes would be out of style.
A bipartisan Senate report found that at least seven people had lost their lives in connection with the Jan. 6 attack.
And no one on this board believes that IF it was an ANTIFA/BLM riot, to overturn a national election, you would be downplaying 'deaths associated'.
Why is your argument based on a distinction that is not a difference? Because the people dead are no less f'ing dead.
The whole f'ing event is way past excuse making. And not a single relative of the people who died gives a flying f'k about moral imbeciles trying to split hairs to diminish the loss of lives.
Imagine your lame ass in front of any of them stating 'at least he didn't die on the day of the riot'. You'd be hit so hard that by the time you stopped rolling your clothes would be out of style.
A bipartisan Senate report found that at least seven people had lost their lives in connection with the Jan. 6 attack.
(1)
(0)
