I feel like mods have always worked to allow constructive and legit criticism. For example, no matter how folks want to spin it we allowed plenty of criticism leveled at Nader and mods even posted plenty themselves. But when it got repetitive, agenda-driven, or just plain unnecessary because it's behind us, such posts were clamped down on.

Did some of us wrongfully defend Nader at times? Absolutely but every single shareholder was lied to and many others outright duped. But to say there was no criticism and everything was viewed through rose-colored glasses is largely inaccurate.

Often, folks have come here to vent or whine, which isn't constructive, and that's not healthy or helpful. So mods trying to nail the balance and keep this place wildly different from iHub, Stocktwits, Yahoo etc. and I think we mostly succeed.