(Total Views: 153)
Posted On: 01/30/2023 10:59:39 AM
Post# of 7802
I see the troll is confused again.
Seafarer has said for over a decade that they thought the Juno wreck was mid-1500s based on the evidence they had gathered and research.
Now that they have seen some of the state's information (thanks to Parsons trying yet again to sabotage SFRX), the state's data confirmed it was 1554. The state archeologist must have had some reason to pinpoint that year. Most likely it was the markings on the coins found on the site decades ago that are now 'missing'.
Not confusing for actual shareholders of SFRX.
#tonnagenottrinkets
Seafarer has said for over a decade that they thought the Juno wreck was mid-1500s based on the evidence they had gathered and research.
Now that they have seen some of the state's information (thanks to Parsons trying yet again to sabotage SFRX), the state's data confirmed it was 1554. The state archeologist must have had some reason to pinpoint that year. Most likely it was the markings on the coins found on the site decades ago that are now 'missing'.
Not confusing for actual shareholders of SFRX.
#tonnagenottrinkets
(0)
(0)
